Registered Dental Hygienist in Alternative Practice (RDHAP) Law and Ethics Practice Exam

Which statement regarding spiritual treatment of children is TRUE?

1. Spiritual treatment always qualifies as neglect

2. A child receiving spiritual treatment may still be considered neglected

3. Medical decisions made by guardians do not constitute neglect

4. All children must receive conventional medical treatment

The correct answer is: Medical decisions made by guardians do not constitute neglect

The assertion that medical decisions made by guardians do not constitute neglect is supported by the laws that recognize the rights of guardians to make decisions regarding their children's healthcare, including the choice to pursue spiritual treatment. In many jurisdictions, if guardians make informed decisions based on their beliefs, including spiritual or alternative practices, this choice is generally respected as long as it does not directly harm the child or fail to meet basic medical needs. This understanding stems from the recognition that parents and guardians are responsible for making treatment choices and that these choices can be shaped by cultural, spiritual, and personal beliefs. It is significant to note, however, that while guardians have this right, there are circumstances where failing to allow for necessary medical intervention—especially in critical situations—can lead to legal implications related to neglect if it can be demonstrated that the child's health is at risk. The other statements suggest assumptions about spiritual treatment and neglect that do not universally apply. Spiritual treatment does not inherently indicate child neglect, and not all children are mandated to receive conventional medical treatment in the presence of alternative beliefs. Understanding these nuances of parental rights and responsibilities is essential in navigating the laws and ethical considerations surrounding children's healthcare choices.